English Bulldog Puppies for Sale in Elizabeth, NJ

Elizabeth, NJ (February 10, 2026) – Emergency responders were dispatched Sunday evening to reports of a pedestrian struck by a vehicle on Erie St in Elizabeth. According to dispatch information, crews arrived to find an injured pedestrian who required immediate medical attention. Paramedics assessed the individual at the scene before transporting the victim to Trinitas Hospital for further care. Responders worked to manage the scene while ensuring the area was secured for both medical treatment and traffic control.

Key Details

What We Know So Far

What’s Not Yet Confirmed

Local Context

Streets like Erie St in Elizabeth often see a mix of residential foot traffic and local vehicle movement, particularly during evening hours. When a pedestrian is involved in an accident, responders typically secure the roadway to protect both the injured person and emergency crews working nearby. Medical evaluations are prioritized, and traffic may be slowed or redirected to allow paramedics space to provide care. Drivers in the area may notice temporary restrictions while responders document positions, assess visibility factors, and ensure the scene is safe before normal traffic flow resumes.

What to Do Next

FAQ

Q: Why can symptoms show up later after an accident?

A: Stress and adrenaline can delay pain, causing injuries to become noticeable hours or even days later.

Q: Why are pedestrian accidents often taken so seriously?

A: Pedestrians have little protection, so even low-speed impacts can result in significant injuries.

Q: Why might officials not release names or details right away?

A: Information may be withheld until families are notified and initial investigations are completed.

NEW JERSEY (WABC) -- Commuters are urged to check the status of their trains before they leave, after NJ Transit announced a few changes following Monday's commuter chaos.

At one point, due to Amtrak overhead wire issues, North Jersey Coast and Northeast Corridor Line rail service were bypassing Newark Airport, North Elizabeth, and Elizabeth Stations.

But, by 6:30 a.m. those bypasses were lifted. Commuters were told to expect a normal weekday commute.

However, it was a different story on Monday. It turned out to be long and frustrating day.

Overhead wire issues caused a disabled train, then disrupted travel and caused delays and cancellations for the entire day.

New Jersey Transit and Amtrak shut down service between Newark and New York Penn Station after a downed wire brought the system to a halt around 7 a.m. Monday.

Then around 9 a.m., a train carrying passengers stopped in its tracks and a rescue train had some issues getting those stranded back to Penn Station Newark, which created a domino effect.

Authorities say during this event, a piece of debris from the overhead wires struck the windshield of the train, resulting in minor injuries to the engineer.

The engineer was taken to a local hospital for treatment. No other injuries were reported to the 300 customers on board.

Shortly after 11:30 a.m., officials announced rail service had resumed on the Northeast Corridor Line between Penn Station New York and Trenton.

But just after 4:30 p.m., officials said NJ Transit would operate limited service for the remainder of the day due to overhead wire issues in the morning.

Trains were still operating on a reduced service for the evening commute.

Commuters were left scrambling trying to figure out a way to work or back.

"It's just like, no point coming to the office. Like I could have done more from home," a commuter said.

"I think they do their best. And it's just the way that infrastructure is set up. What are you going to do?" another person said.

New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill released a statement, saying these issues are another reason why she is fighting to get funding restored for the Gateway Tunnel.

Despite a judge's order to resume funding by this coming Thursday, the project is on hold.

The Gateway commission says it will not reopen the project until it gets its funding.

Customers can visit njtransit.com/abc for available alternate service information.

----------

Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

Elizabeth’s tenants notched a partial victory in an ongoing legal battle with landlords over rent control, with a state judge’s ruling that they had collected enough valid signatures for a referendum to restore a $20-a-year cap on increases.

“The court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to sustain their burden of proof to establish their claims contained within the Second Count of the Complaint,” Superior Court Judge John Deitch said in his Jan. 31 ruling. “That Count is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.”

The ruling addressed one of three counts in a lawsuit by a coalition of landlords opposed to the Elizabeth City Council’s restoration of the decades-old $20 cap in July. Landlords had long argued that the cap is too low, and the council replaced it with a 3% annual limit in 2022, before restoring it last summer in response to public sentiment expressed in the petition drive.

Tenant advocates applauded Deitch’s recent ruling.

“We feel vindicated that we faithfully solicited a petition,” said Isaac Jimenez, 30, an organizer with the Freelizabeth petition drive the landlords had sought to invalidate.

“It’s validating for the 700 people that signed our petitions,” Jimenez added, “and for the many more that know that Elizabeth is becoming unaffordable and that we need real renter relief now.”

The first count in the landlords’ suit charged that the council violated state law, 40:49-2, requiring public notice seven days prior to voting to rescind the 3% cap and at least 10 days between the votes to introduce the ordinance and the adopt it.

The judge agreed, and temporarily blocked the move, allowing the 3% cap to remain in effect pending final resolution of the case.

The second count involved the petition issue that resulted in the recent ruling in favor of the tenants, leaving open the possibility that a referendum could be held depending on how the lawsuit and the broader rent control issue plays out.

The third charge that the $20 annual cap was too low to fund adequate maintenance of rent-controlled apartments, amounting to an unconstitutional taking of the landlords’ property. The judge hasn’t yet ruled on that count, and an additional hearing may be scheduled depending on factors including whether the landlords, tenants and the council come to some kind of agreement.

Renee Steinhagen, the tenants’ lawyer, said the next move rests with the landlords.

“Landlords are still challenging the $20 annual rent increase cap, arguing that it is unconstitutional and arbitrary,” she said. “They can ask the court to rule on that claim, withdraw it, or seek a settlement.”

She said that if the landlords proceed with the case, the tenants and the city will defend the $20 cap.

Otherwise, Steinhagen said, the tenants plan to ask the judge to dismiss the remaining count.

Steinhagen and other tenant advocates say they don’t expect that the council will take a re-vote to reinstate the $20 cap unless the landlords drop their legal challenge.

“The Committee of Petitioners says it is preparing to take the issue directly to voters, and make housing affordability and rent control a central issue in the 2026 general midterm election,” Steinhagen said.

A lawyer for the landlords, Matthew Moench, said the owners are currently reviewing their options.

“The owners still have substantive challenges remaining as to the arbitrary and unreasonable monetary cap,” Moench said, “which if enacted would diminish the quality of life for many tenants as building owners would be unable to maintain and improve the buildings subject to the rent-control cap.”

He added, “this putative and burdensome cap will harm the very residents the Committee of the Petitioners claim they are trying to help.”

Meanwhile, the Elizabeth City Council has the authority to pass an amendment reinstating the $20 cap — mindful this time to abide by procedural requirements. If council fails to act, the 3% annual increase would remain in place indefinitely, or pending a referendum to replace it with the old $20 cap.

Former City Council President Carlos Cedeño has previously said he and fellow members will not comment or take action until the lawsuit is resolved.

Jimenez, the Freelizabeth organizer, said he feels confident moving forward.

“The $20 rent cap existed in Elizabeth for over 30 years,” he said, “and we expect to have a good result out of this last one.”

Correction: This article initially misidentified the state law that a judge found the Elizabeth City Council violated when voting to rescind a 3% cap on annual rent increases in July.